This con artist Adir Fassina slashes people's tires at his office's parking lot (1499 Bayshore Hwy., Burlingame) and he uses parking chalk to mark all the tenant's tires every Thursday at midnight when he thinks no one is looking. Scammed me out of more than $600 for limo services he never provided. The real world doesn't give fourth, fifth, or sixth chances for really offensive remarks so why should Google +? Other than that Google + is an okay site. I believe in freedom of speech but some things just cross the line.
On other sites, she would have probably been permanently ip banned. Yet she was allowed to keep on coming back. There was this crazy teenage girl who was banned like six times for making horrific posts promoting racism, demeaning veterans, blaming rape victims for their fate, and encouraging violence against children and animals. What is the point of blocking if this is the case? Another minus point about Google + is the fact that users who violate its community standards multiple times are allowed to keep on coming back.
It makes it so that whoever you block for being a douche to you can still see your content even if they don't have an alt all they need to do is log off. While this may sound good, it really is not.
#GOOGLE PLUS REVIEW OF UNICO RIVIERA MAYA FULL#
One of them is the fact that anyone on the Internet can access the full site even if they don't have an account (in contrast to Facebook and Twitter where you have to actually log in to do that). But aside from that it is has serious deficiencies. One plus point is that Google + facilitates discussion and debates on topics that one may not be comfortable discussing with friends or family.
0 kommentar(er)
